Download Action, Ethics, and Responsibility (Topics in Contemporary by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, Harry S. Silverstein PDF

By Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, Harry S. Silverstein

Best philosophers discover accountability from numerous views, together with metaphysics, motion idea, and philosophy of legislation.

Show description

Read or Download Action, Ethics, and Responsibility (Topics in Contemporary Philosophy) PDF

Best ethics & morality books

Ethics and Politics: Volume 2: Selected Essays

Alasdair MacIntyre is among the so much artistic and significant philosophers operating this day. This quantity provides a range of his vintage essays on ethics and politics accumulated jointly for the 1st time, focussing fairly at the topics of ethical war of words, ethical dilemmas, and truthfulness and its value.

Philosophy and Technology (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements)

This choice of essays examines the philosophical and cultural points of know-how. the problems variety widely--from quantum know-how to difficulties of expertise and tradition in a constructing nation and members method the problems from a number of views. the quantity comprises case reviews, and likewise extra theoretical items that think about the basic query of no matter if know-how might be perceived as a strength for liberation or enslavement.

Sovereign Justice: Global Justice in a World of Nations

During the last years worldwide justice has confirmed itself as one of many new and such a lot promising frontiers of political thought. Sovereign Justice collects important contributions from students of either continental and analytic culture, and goals to enquire into the connection among worldwide justice and the state kingdom.

Extra info for Action, Ethics, and Responsibility (Topics in Contemporary Philosophy)

Example text

Killing may impose a greater burden of guilt, and it may undermine human sensibilities that normally restrain us from acts that harm society. Quinn and Foot are nonconsequentialists who justify the DDA by appeal to an account of positive and negative rights. Killing violates negative rights against harmful intervention, whereas letting die violates positive rights to assistance. 23 Consequentialists, on the other hand, are too ready to use numbers to decide. Perhaps they may think that we should allow three to die rather than kill two persons, given the harmful effects on society of acts 32 D.

10. If the agent knows and is certain that an effect will result from his action, and he took this into consideration in making his choice, it is not intuitive to say that he does not intend to bring about the effect. This is the criterion of closeness suggested by Foot (1978), 21–22. 11. Isaacs (1995, 362) has made a similar criticism of Jeff McMahan’s (1993) distinction between killing and letting die. 12. Quinn (1993, 166) briefly discusses the Trolley examples. 13. The attempt by an anonymous referee to invent a test case where the survival of the five is solely determined by whether the rescuer gets to help them (and nothing else) only illustrates how difficult the assumption is.

Reprinted in 1990 as the paperbacks: Mind and Brain (vol. 1) and The Consequences of Determinism (vol. 2). Honderich, T. 2002. How Free Are You? 2nd ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Honderich, T. 2004. After Compatibilism and Incompatibilism. In Freedom and Determinism, ed. J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, and D. Shier. : MIT Press. James, W. 1956. The Dilemma of Determinism. In The Will to Believe and Other Essays. New York: Dover. Kane, R. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.14 of 5 – based on 42 votes
 

Author: admin